Sunday, April 29, 2007

There Is No Clever Title For This

An aside, I did a post asking what to read other than The New York Times, nationally, for news. Hedy said to try The Washington Post. Not quite right-wing; but, All The President’s Men made an impression on me back when.

So I just did. Damn you Hedy; and, that’s only the first bad word.

Fill in forty or fifty expletives of your own choice for what I might otherwise have to type.

Here’s the headline:

"82 Inmates Cleared But Still Held At Guantanamo"

We, you, me, our piece-of-shit government, can’t get rid of them because no one will take them. The “worst of the worst” include about twenty percent of the approximately 385 detainees there, who are, by our piece-of-shit government’s lights, now magically, after five years, innocent. Read that word again. INNOCENT.

I really want to bang this out, to get it out of me. I’ll go slower and try to cut down on the bad words.

“Since February, the Pentagon has notified about 85 inmates or their attorneys that they are eligible to leave after being cleared by military review panels. But only a handful have gone home, including a Moroccan and an Afghan who were released Tuesday. Eighty-two remain at Guantanamo and face indefinite waits as U.S. officials struggle to figure out when and where to deport them, and under what conditions”

“Of the roughly 385 still incarcerated, U.S. officials said they intend to eventually put 60 to 80 on trial and free the rest. But the judicial process has likewise moved at a glacial pace, largely because of constitutional legal challenges.” How’s that for another nice percentage. They started out with 680 people there. They want to give all but ten to twelve percent of them a cardboard suitcase, a shiny suit and shoes and a sawbuck and put ‘em out on the sidewalk. Only the bus that goes back home won’t pick them up.

Oh, those nasty constitutional legal challenges. I felt another bad word coming on. I’m better now. Now I know why the Justice Department has taken the approach it has and that I have railed against in a few posts. They just want to get rid of the opposition so that they can focus on getting those countries that we lifted these people from to take them back. Well no, that doesn’t make much sense. Then what the hell does? Sorry.

"’In general, most countries simply do not want to help,’ said John B. Bellinger III, legal adviser to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. ‘Countries believe this is not their problem. They think they didn't contribute to Guantanamo, and therefore they don't have to be part of the solution.’" Poor John III and Condi, they have the Men Who Came to Dinner and their relatives won’t take them back after dessert. I know there are a lot of dumb references here; but, it’s better than swearing.

I’m probably going to swear big time after this copy and paste:

"’It often takes us months and months, or even years, to negotiate the human rights assurances that we are comfortable with before we will transfer someone to another country,’" said Bellinger, the State Department's legal adviser.” HUMAN RIGHTS ASSURANCES? If this were an Email, I’d be breaching Netiquette with all these capital letters. No cursing. This man works for the same government that worked a deal with the Australian guy last month to let him go if he promised he wasn't tortured, and wouldn't sue the U.S. based on being tortured, which of course he wasn't. The same Administration that went round and round with Congress about the subtle differences between torture and coercion, not that either was ever employed.

There’s more garbage spewed by our government in the article, but enough is enough.

Here’s my solution:

We have something like 300 now “OK's of the maybe bads” stewing on the tip of Cuba. If you count up the military’s general officers, Cabinet Officers, and assistants, GWB, Dead-eye Dick, you gotta total that number. Most of them have a valet, a driver, a nanny, a cook, you know those menial positions that everyone who runs roughshod on whims needs to make life comfortable. Bring up the newly OK guys, with their guards (don't want these OK guys to get any ideas) spread them out among our elite. Most of the menials there now are probably wetbacks anyway. Send them south. Let Fidel and Raul worry about them. Mr. Bellinger and Condi can be counted on not to abuse the new OK guys' human rights, can’t they? Maybe our government elite types can teach these guys how people in the land of the free and home of the brave.............whatever. I suppose we’ll need a few extra guards for the Cheney residence. Not for the staff, for Dead-eye.

I’m going off to think of more bad words. Fuckers.

8 comments:

fermicat said...

The more we find out about Guantanamo, the more it pisses me off.

If you have an hour to listen to streaming radio, check out This American Life's Habeas Schmabeas. It won a Peabody, and right now they are offering a free MP3 download, so you could get it now and listen later if you choose. It is great radio, and gives a not-often-heard new perspective on Gitmo detainees.

My own opinion about the detainees is that they should be tried immediately (fairly, i.e. able to see the evidence against them) or let go. We are supposed to be the good guys, but our actions lately have not been in that mold. It is not right to hold people indefinitely, without trial and without being able to have contact with family or their lawyers. We would never stand for it, if some other entity were doing this to our own people, so why should we stand for our government doing it to others?

Anonymous said...

This administration is creating new terrorists faster than they can kill them.

Ryan said...

Why is the government only transparent where "they" want it to be?

I thought we controlled that?

You can use some bad words on me Dave. I believe you summed up the entire debacle of our government with the last word in your post... and it almost wasn't strong enough.

Anonymous said...

You're so Left wing it makes me sick. You people want to be free and safe, but don't want to hear or take any of the actions necessary to keep you/us safe. Do you really believe these people were just moseying down the street in Afghanistan and we just attacked them and sent them to Guantanamo?...GET EFFIN REAL PEOPLE! Our Gov't is keeping us SAFE. If you don't like it, try living in Afghanistan or Lebanon and see what it's like to live where the Gov't doesnt have the ability to keep you safe!

So, you just enjoy walking safely down the street this afternoon and also feel priveleged that you have the freedom to speak freely.

Anonymous said...

I've got a really great idea. Let's take all of these great people from Guantanamo, and move them right into "Rather than Working's" Neighborhood. He could be best buddies with all of these "innocent" people.

Anonymous said...

You're so Left wing it makes me sick. You people want to be free and safe, but don't want to hear or take any of the actions necessary to keep you/us safe.

What ignorant nonsense.

If this administration had any interest in keeping us safe, they'd take $200B of the $500B that have been wasted so far in "Bush Payback Time", and spend it where it might actually do some good...here at home.

As the Brits are proving on an almost daily basis, strong intelligence combined with thorough policing are the keys to security.

Life Hiker said...

I'm sorry that there are so many "Appreciative" people in our country - people that believe that our killing or detaining a bunch of nasty guys in faraway places somehow makes us safer.

I'm sorry because it's a shame they haven't been able to think it through. They just listen to people who say it's true, so to them it's true.

The fact is that many of our senior retired military officers, including many generals and generals who fought in Iraq, think this war was ill-conceived and poorly fought. Recently a retired general turned down the assignment of coordinating the Iraq/Afganistan war because "there is no strategy". Just recently an officer who teaches at West Point wrote a very critical article about the war in Army Times. Did you miss all this, Appreciative?

I was an officer in the 101st Airborne, and many of my friends have significant military experience. Most are adamantly against this war. Call us names, Appreciative! We earned our right to criticize this stupid president.

Dave said...

Kvatch and Life Hiker,

Given my internet clumsiness, I commented on your comments here, in the comments on my post responding to App's comment, if that makes any sense. If it doesn't, go to my April 30 post and its comments.