Saturday, July 21, 2007

Half A Loaf

The New York Times reports that “[a] federal appeals court ordered the government yesterday to turn over virtually all its information on Guantanamo detainees who are challenging their detention, rejecting an effort by the Justice Department to limit disclosures and setting the stage for new legal battles over the government’s reasons for holding the men indefinitely.”

The Court though didn’t really order disclosure of “virtually all” government information. The government must turn over the information which is “reasonably available.”


“[D]etainees’ lawyers … said the ruling created the likelihood of fresh legal battles over what information in the government’s vast intelligence files was covered, and whether the government in fact produces all its information dealing with specific detainees.”

Seems to me that the Court has merely shifted the battleground, at least for the next year and a half that Alberto Gonzales is running the Justice Department. What do you think his staff will determine is “reasonably available?”


4 comments:

Ryan said...

I would imagine that without a proper definition, "reasonably available" probably means

"Not a flying chance in hell".... or something very similar to that.

Good to see you're still here Dave! I'll be back to catch up on your posts that I missed.

Dave said...

So, you're no longer betrothed? Just plain married?

Should I visit you?

Anonymous said...

The only information available at all is the information that they themselves have already released.

My guess is that anything incriminating has already been shredded.

Anonymous said...

What do you think his staff will determine is “reasonably available?

"Reasonably available? Now where did I put that shredder?"